[Bug lto/66305] -ffat-lto-objects create unreproducible objects

2020-01-31 Thread peter at lekensteyn dot nl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at lekensteyn dot nl --- Comment #6 fro

[Bug lto/66305] -ffat-lto-objects create unreproducible objects

2015-12-10 Thread dkg at fifthhorseman dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305 Daniel Kahn Gillmor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dkg at fifthhorseman dot net --- C

[Bug lto/66305] -ffat-lto-objects create unreproducible objects

2015-05-27 Thread andi at firstfloor dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305 --- Comment #4 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- > --- Comment #3 from lunar at debian dot org --- > Richard Biener: > > I think they become deterministic with -frandom-seed=0 for example. > > They are not deterministic to support partial linkin

[Bug lto/66305] -ffat-lto-objects create unreproducible objects

2015-05-27 Thread lunar at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305 --- Comment #3 from lunar at debian dot org --- Richard Biener: > I think they become deterministic with -frandom-seed=0 for example. > They are not deterministic to support partial linking of LTO objects as far > as I know. They are indeed repro

[Bug lto/66305] -ffat-lto-objects create unreproducible objects

2015-05-27 Thread andi at firstfloor dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305 --- Comment #2 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:21:04PM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- > I think they become deterministic with -frandom-seed=0 for example. They ar

[Bug lto/66305] -ffat-lto-objects create unreproducible objects

2015-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto CC|