[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-08-28 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-08-28 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Aug 28 16:23:12 2015 New Revision: 227307 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227307&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH][lto/66752] Fix missed FSM jump thread PR lto/66752

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-08-27 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law --- The fix for the ppc64 bootstrap regression looks good. I'm just having a bear of a time producing a reasonable test for the regression suite.

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-31 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Just a status update. This patch causes the stage1 compiler to mis-compile tree-ssa-live, which in turn causes the stage2 compiler to incorrectly issue an error when building the stage3 compiler on ppc64.

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-29 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Causes bootstrap failure on ppc64 that I haven't had time to dig into.

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-29 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-24 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Sat Jul 25 05:45:42 2015 New Revision: 226206 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226206&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Revert: PR lto/66752 * tree-ssa-threadedge.c (simplify_con

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed by our testers.

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-23 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-23 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Jul 23 20:42:15 2015 New Revision: 226125 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226125&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/66752 * tree-ssa-threadedge.c (simplify_conrol_stmt_

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-23 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- After tracking down a couple bugs in the FSM support, I'm about ready to check in a patch that should address the missed jump threads.

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks like bug 13876.

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-10 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 35947 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35947&action=edit test-case to reproduce compile with -Ofast -m32 -march=slm and notice redundant test .L30: testl %e

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-10 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-03 Thread evstupac at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Stupachenko Evgeny changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/66752] spec2000 255.vortex performance compiled with GCC is ~20% lower than with CLANG

2015-07-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* CC|