https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #13 from Andrey Guskov ---
The revision was wrong, it`s today`s build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Guskov ---
Well, that was faster than I expected.
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=20171211/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: sour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Guskov ---
Understood. Going to report back tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, the #c1/#c2 bug should be fixed. No idea about #c0 or #c3 which look to be
separate issues (without a simple reproducer).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 9 11:43:31 2017
New Revision: 255523
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255523&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83338
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> This works for me, but I'll leave testcase and testing for tomorrow.
You are fast :-)
> @@ -5546,6 +5554,15 @@ vectorizable_operation (gimple *stmt, gi
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This works for me, but I'll leave testcase and testing for tomorrow.
--- gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c.jj2017-12-08 12:21:58.0 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c 2017-12-09 00:55:17.614147824 +0100
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> I believe the bug is that get_vectype_for_scalar_type for the operands of
> POINTER_DIFF_EXPR is vector of unsigned elements, the result of
> POINTER_DIFF_EXPR is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Guskov ---
32-bit SPEC CPU2006::447 also affected.
during GIMPLE pass: vect
fe.cc:681:1: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
0xcb7db1 verify_gimple_in_cfg(function*, bool)
/user/aguskov/scratch/agusko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
void f(char**p,char**q,long*r){
for(int i=0;i<1024;i++)
r[i]=p[i]-q[i];
}
with g++ -O3 on x86_64 also ICEs, let's start with that (I don't have access to
SPEC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov ---
32-bit SPEC CPU2006::436 also affected.
during GIMPLE pass: vect
regex.c: In function 'regexec.constprop':
regex.c:5755:1: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_mask_load_store, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:2349
14 matches
Mail list logo