https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #19 from Emil Jiří Tywoniak ---
(In reply to Emil Jiří Tywoniak from comment #18)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #17)
> > Any chance you can try with a toolchain using binutils-2.35?
> >
> > As I indicated in https://bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #18 from Emil Jiří Tywoniak ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #17)
> Any chance you can try with a toolchain using binutils-2.35?
>
> As I indicated in https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/+bug/1747966
> there's a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Emil Jiří Tywoniak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emil at tywoniak dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
eitan at mosenkis dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eitan at mosenkis dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Matthijs Kooijman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthijs at stdin dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> and then I get
>
> > gcc-7 t2.s t1.c -flto
> /tmp/ccGhH7Cp.o:(.data+0x0): undefined reference to `Handler'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> > gcc-7 t1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Bernd K changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prof7bit at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, hurwic8 at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
>
> --- Comment #7 from Rafał Mszal ---
> Thanks for response.
>
> I've send some basi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Still not 100% sure which Handler should prevail in resolving the symbol for
Dispatch. Currently it seems the non-weak one prevails which looks correct.
I think in both cases the resolution from GNU ld is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #7 from Rafał Mszal ---
Thanks for response.
I've send some basic example of the failure. However, it needs some others file
to compile and link, like linker, SystemInit function decalration and so on.
I've just send you most import
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #6 from Rafał Mszal ---
Created attachment 43212
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43212&action=edit
Startup file for the nRF52 microcontroller.
This is typical startup for nRF5x microcontrollers. The main thing th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #5 from Rafał Mszal ---
Created attachment 43211
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43211&action=edit
Makefile that causes failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #4 from Rafał Mszal ---
Created attachment 43210
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43210&action=edit
Basic example of main funtion with LTO failure.
This is simple example of observed LTO issue. RTC1_IRQHandler is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On January 22, 2018 4:36:00 PM GMT+01:00, "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
>
>--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Also I was going to say
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also I was going to say the c function maybe should be marked as used as lto
likes to remove unused functions in general.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, wrong-code
Target|
19 matches
Mail list logo