[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2018-02-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-07-17 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Romain Geissler from comment #3) > Hi, > > @Martin (and @Richard), I have seen you submitted this patch > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01059.html which I guess would > fix this b

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-07-17 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #5 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, Your patch applies cleanly to both gcc 8 and 9. I was able to bootstrap two toochains gcc 8 and 9 with it, however it caused regression in the binutils testsuite: FAIL: ld-plugin/lto-3r FAIL: ld-plugi

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-07-19 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #6 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, After trying to build our own set of open source components with this patch (among the sqlite, openssl, boost, tcmalloc), we have no link issues resulting from this change. Tested with gcc 8 and gcc 9.

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-07-22 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Ok, I've just installed the patch as r273662. The tests in binutils are now invalid as they grep for the symbol: $ cat ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-3r.d #ld: -r tmpdir/lto-3b.o #source: dummy.s #nm: -p #... [0

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-09-07 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-09-08 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- @Romain: Yes, let's close it. Thank you for the testing of the patch in other branches. Backporting the patch, please consider also using the following fix: commit dcaf4c7b4cb9bd70b96b2499ca275d5831328dd0 Au

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-09-09 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #10 from Romain Geissler --- Ah thanks, I had backported this one as well, but not the one you mentionned: commit 217597acb2493b727255b66cd199fafa065427b7 Author: marxin Date: Wed Jul 24 07:00:48 2019 + Fix off-by-one in

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-07-15 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, @Martin (and @Richard), I have seen you submitted this patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01059.html which I guess would fix this bug. If accepted in gcc 10, do you think it is safe to

[Bug lto/84579] __gnu_lto_v1 should be removed when linking with -fno-lto

2019-07-15 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579 --- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, @Martin (and @Richard), I have seen you submitted this patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01059.html which I guess would fix this bug. If accepted in gcc 10, do you think it is safe to