https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Romain Geissler from comment #3)
> Hi,
>
> @Martin (and @Richard), I have seen you submitted this patch
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01059.html which I guess would
> fix this b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
--- Comment #5 from Romain Geissler ---
Hi,
Your patch applies cleanly to both gcc 8 and 9. I was able to bootstrap two
toochains gcc 8 and 9 with it, however it caused regression in the binutils
testsuite:
FAIL: ld-plugin/lto-3r
FAIL: ld-plugi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
--- Comment #6 from Romain Geissler ---
Hi,
After trying to build our own set of open source components with this patch
(among the sqlite, openssl, boost, tcmalloc), we have no link issues resulting
from this change. Tested with gcc 8 and gcc 9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, I've just installed the patch as r273662.
The tests in binutils are now invalid as they grep for the symbol:
$ cat ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-3r.d
#ld: -r tmpdir/lto-3b.o
#source: dummy.s
#nm: -p
#...
[0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
@Romain: Yes, let's close it. Thank you for the testing of the patch in other
branches.
Backporting the patch, please consider also using the following fix:
commit dcaf4c7b4cb9bd70b96b2499ca275d5831328dd0
Au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
--- Comment #10 from Romain Geissler ---
Ah thanks, I had backported this one as well, but not the one you mentionned:
commit 217597acb2493b727255b66cd199fafa065427b7
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Jul 24 07:00:48 2019 +
Fix off-by-one in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
--- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler ---
Hi,
@Martin (and @Richard), I have seen you submitted this patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01059.html which I guess would
fix this bug. If accepted in gcc 10, do you think it is safe to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84579
--- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler ---
Hi,
@Martin (and @Richard), I have seen you submitted this patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01059.html which I guess would
fix this bug. If accepted in gcc 10, do you think it is safe to
10 matches
Mail list logo