[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

2018-06-21 Thread zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 --- Comment #5 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net --- This is a bug in ld.bfd. It's setting the resolution for entry symbols to LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP instead of LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF. gold handles them right. I posted a patch in

[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

2018-07-04 Thread zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED R

[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

2018-06-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

2018-06-18 Thread zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

2018-06-18 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug lto/86175] LTO code generator does not respect ld -u option to force symbol inclusion in the link product

2018-06-18 Thread zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175 zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED