[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-15 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- Sounds like a dup of PR93069

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-15 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw --- Suggest you run the application under "strace -f" to try to identify what is being duplicated.

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-15 Thread jdobry at centrum dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #8 from jdobry at centrum dot cz --- It is NOT duplicate of PR90369. I belive that I found problem and solution already. Problem is somewhere in binutils. Released version 2.31 nad 2.32 are broken. Previous version 2.30 is OK. Current

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-16 Thread jdobry at centrum dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 jdobry at centrum dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-16 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #10 from Richard

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-14 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-14 Thread jdobry at centrum dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #2 from jdobry at centrum dot cz --- No, it isn't duplicate to PR90369. 1) I try to apply PR90369 patch without any difference. 2) This problem is independent to -save-temps parameter.

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-14 Thread jdobry at centrum dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #3 from jdobry at centrum dot cz --- Here is update for big-endian multilib compilation https://pastebin.com/mzm12Q8m (fix typo in MULTILIB_MATCHES line)

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-15 Thread jdobry at centrum dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #4 from jdobry at centrum dot cz --- It is possible that this bug can be related to https://answers.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/+question/682041 Only maybe. I don't know it.

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

2019-07-15 Thread jdobry at centrum dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 --- Comment #5 from jdobry at centrum dot cz --- I found one new dependency of this bug: GCC 9.1.0 + binutils 2.30 is OK GCC 9.1.0 + binutils 2.32 failing with " error: could not unlink output file" Everything except binutils version was same. I