https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755
--- Comment #7 from afernandez at odyhpc dot com ---
@anlauf. Thanks! I'll open a PR with the developers so that they fix these
issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please replace the wrong specifics by the proper generic:
min0 -> min
max0 -> max
This should work and makes the code standard conforming.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755
--- Comment #5 from afernandez at odyhpc dot com ---
I just tried -std=legacy but it made no difference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> If I'm understanding correctly and this is an extension being deprecated,
> is there any option to push the compilation with gcc11.1 through?
Did you try -std=legcy?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755
--- Comment #3 from afernandez at odyhpc dot com ---
Sorry for the delay. The system is AArch64 and running CentOS8.3. I have 2 GCC
installations, one is 8.3.1 and the second is 11.1.0. NCEPLIBS builds with the
former but not with the second.
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
