https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d79958a50eb5419ebb9baa5ef880aabeef05467
commit r9-10157-g6d79958a50eb5419ebb9baa5ef880aabeef05467
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95f6eb7ae707482fdeed57b0906dacb8e675385d
commit r9-10118-g95f6eb7ae707482fdeed57b0906dacb8e675385d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03bd2b252bca8c0ba4aeecab8b560d751f2ef57d
commit r10-10669-g03bd2b252bca8c0ba4aeecab8b560d751f2ef57d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:baf18a6d47c4325be004cb6289d4057b113de282
commit r11-9504-gbaf18a6d47c4325be004cb6289d4057b113de282
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffc7f200adbdf47f14b3594d9b21855c19cf797a
commit r12-6739-gffc7f200adbdf47f14b3594d9b21855c19cf797a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52229
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52229&action=edit
gcc12-pr102860-2.patch
And here is IMHO a better one that for VECTOR_TYPE just returns unknown_optab
so that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52218|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #6 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fortran's modulo is floor_mod as documented here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/MODULO.html?
Syntax:
RESULT = MODULO(A, P)
Return value:
The type and kind of the result are those of th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For completeness this also affects two other test cases:
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd2.f90 -O2 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd2.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 102938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
17 matches
Mail list logo