https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
--- Comment #5 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> Not seen on Haswell (but w/o PGO). Is this PGO specific? There's another
> large jump visible end of 2019.
It is between 2019-11-15 and 18 but the revisions does not exist at git
- perhap
> Not seen on Haswell (but w/o PGO). Is this PGO specific? There's another
> large jump visible end of 2019.
It is between 2019-11-15 and 18 but the revisions does not exist at git
- perhaps they reffer to the old git mirror. Martin will know better.
In that range there are many of Richard's vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> Not seen on Haswell (but w/o PGO). Is this PGO specific? There's another
> large jump visible end of 2019.
This is kabylake LTO+PGO+march=native
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
train data:
Samples: 6K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 7715838425
Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol
5.68% 382 calculi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, IIRC calculix train data and ref data do not match up wrt the hottest
loops, so not sure whether any regression here is considered important. Maybe
the profile is now preserved better.
I can't reprod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
CC|
