https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104402
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rgue...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa26d65dfb41e527bd0db3af3ec2a6ac052019f4 commit r10-10594-gfa26d65dfb41e527bd0db3af3ec2a6ac052019f4 Author: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> Date: Mon Feb 7 09:31:07 2022 +0100 middle-end/104402 - split out _Complex compares from COND_EXPRs This makes sure we always have a _Complex compare split to a different stmt for the compare operand in a COND_EXPR on GIMPLE. Complex lowering doesn't handle this and the change is something we want for all kind of compares at some point. 2022-02-07 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> PR middle-end/104402 * gimple-expr.c (is_gimple_condexpr): _Complex typed compares are not valid. * tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_assign_ternary): For COND_EXPR check is_gimple_condexpr. * gcc.dg/torture/pr104402.c: New testcase. (cherry picked from commit 70430001b74d0f67386a6b3642c857b3389cd5d0)
