https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop ---
Thanks Richard.
The patch fixed the larger test as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c17873d83aaeed037fb5d039df2e6303d4b6a553
commit r10-11083-gc17873d83aaeed037fb5d039df2e6303d4b6a553
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Note that while this might be part of the solution we then still "wreck" EH
anyway by throwing it away instead of trying to replicate it for each component
compare.
So I'm not sure the proposed change is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Yes expand_vector_condition needs a similar fix just as PR 104450 did.
Basically the bug is latent even on the trunk still.
Something like:
diff --git a/gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Yes expand_vector_condition needs a similar fix just as PR 104450 did.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|gcc-10 ICE with
