https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
--- Comment #7 from cuilili ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #6)
> I believe this has been fixed?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
I believe this has been fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lili Cui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4633e38cd22c5e51fac984124c7627be912d0999
commit r14-2185-g4633e38cd22c5e51fac984124c7627be912d0999
Author: Lili Cui
Date: Thu Jun 29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
zen3 fma requires all inputs to be ready to start execution, separate
multiply+add can start multiplication earlier. Not sure if that explains the
difference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
--- Comment #3 from cuilili ---
I reproduced S1244 regression on znver3.
Src code:
for (int i = 0; i < LEN_1D-1; i++)
{
a[i] = b[i] + c[i] * c[i] + b[i] * b[i] + c[i];
d[i] = a[i] + a[i+1];
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
cuilili changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lili.cui at intel dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
Target|
