[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 110376 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-06-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 110491 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-06-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch --- Comm

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-01 Thread zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #21 from Zhendong Su --- Another very likely related reproducer. [628] % gcctk -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcctk COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/local/home/suz/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #21) > Another very likely related reproducer. Yes: [local count: 82077551]: a.0_1 = a; _27 = a.0_1 == 0; _5 = (int) _27; _28 = _5 | i_14; pretmp_45 = b; .

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #22) > (In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #21) > > Another very likely related reproducer. > Yes: >[local count: 82077551]: > a.0_1 = a; > _27 = a.0_1 == 0

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-03 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-03 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #25 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Specifically this bug.c.034t.ccp1's bit looks fishy: ... Folding statement: LookupFlags_14 = 1; Queued stmt for removal. Folds to: 1 Folding statement: LookupFlags_15 = 0; Queued stmt for removal. F

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #24) > Trying to understand the failure mode here: > > In bug.c.033t.early_objsz I still see the explicit stores to LocalFlags: > >: > LookupFlags_15 =

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #28 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b083203f053f1666e9cc1ded2abdf4e1688d1ec0 commit r14-2289-gb083203f053f1666e9cc1ded2abdf4e1688d1ec0 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #29 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-04 Thread zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #30 from Zhendong Su --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #29) > I can't reproduce the original failure on trunk or with GCC 13.1, but the > testcase from comment#16 is now fixed. I also cannot reproduce the testcase > from

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #31 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #30) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #29) > > I can't reproduce the original failure on trunk or with GCC 13.1, but the > > testcase from comment#16 is now

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-04 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #32 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #29) > I can't reproduce the original failure on trunk or with GCC 13.1, but the > testcase from comment#16 is now fixed. I also cannot reproduce the testcase

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 4 Jul 2023, slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 > > --- Comment #32 from Sergei Trofimovich --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from co

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

2023-07-04 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #34 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #33) > On Tue, 4 Jul 2023, slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 > > > > --- Comment #32 from Sergei T