https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #15 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry for the regression, and thanks for the prompt fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6c01334ccfca8bc748c8de90ba2a636d1662490
commit r14-5902-ge6c01334ccfca8bc748c8de90ba2a636d1662490
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2065438db4ac13af7e0de2f934959413647f74a7
commit r14-5890-g2065438db4ac13af7e0de2f934959413647f74a7
Author: Prathamesh Kulkar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #10 from Richard Sandiford ---
Yeah, the problem went latent after the fix for PR111648, but the underlying
problem is still there. Prathamesh is working on a fix for that. See the
thread starting at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
The ICE seems to be gone, and the generated code looks correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 10.10.2023 um 16:07 schrieb prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
>
> --- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #7 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> It seems we have VECTOR_CST_NELTS_PER_PATTERN ({ 9.0e+0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 })
> 2 and VECTOR_CST_NPATTERNS == 1. And the selector { 1, 0, 1, 2 }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
> >
> > --- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
>
> --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> The issue is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue is that we only support integral vector types in fold_vec_perm_cst,
but fail to check for the same before calling it from fold_vec_perm.
The following tweak fixes the ICE:
diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
--- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
Sorry for the breakage, will take a look.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111754
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
15 matches
Mail list logo