https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113179
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #6)
> With some test on some CPUs, in fact, the lacking of `sll` won't make
> troubles to us.
> It seems that most of MIPS64 CPUs can process it well as expected.
When
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113179
--- Comment #6 from YunQiang Su ---
With some test on some CPUs, in fact, the lacking of `sll` won't make troubles
to us.
It seems that most of MIPS64 CPUs can process it well as expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113179
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113179
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d5d2b879ae7636ca118fb4f3a08b22705cdeacb
commit r15-171-g7d5d2b879ae7636ca118fb4f3a08b22705cdeacb
Author: YunQiang Su
Date: Mon Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113179
--- Comment #3 from YunQiang Su ---
36088299955f95ab58a5758cba2f29b84c8fbfbc is the first bad commit
commit 36088299955f95ab58a5758cba2f29b84c8fbfbc
Author: Richard Biener
Date: W
