[Bug middle-end/115767] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

2024-07-04 Thread bugs at qult dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 --- Comment #5 from Ignacy Gawędzki --- FWIW, I ran a git bisect from releases/gcc-10.5.0 to releases/gcc-11.1.0 and the first bad commit is d119f34c952f8718fdbabc63e2f369a16e92fa07, which adds modref/ipa_modref optimization passes.

[Bug middle-end/115767] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

2024-07-03 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug middle-end/115767] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

2024-07-03 Thread bugs at qult dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 Ignacy Gawędzki changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64 x86_64 --- Comment #3 from Ig

[Bug middle-end/115767] [11/12/13/14/15 regression] GCC loses track of value on aarch64 with -O2

2024-07-03 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC loses track of value on |[11/12/13/14/15 regression]