--- Comment #27 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-16 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR middle-end/18071
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01366.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.or
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18071
--- Comment #28 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 23:16 ---
Open regression with no activity since February 14. Ping?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18071
--- Comment #29 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-17 10:46 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Open regression with no activity since February 14. Ping?
>
The last thread about this was in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00523.html
Summarising:
* C++ front-end sets
--- Comment #31 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 15:22
---
Created an attachment (id=14943)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14943&action=view)
other approach to supress the warnings
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18071
--- Comment #30 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 15:21
---
I suggest to tag the DECL with TREE_NO_WARNING if -fno-default-inline is set
and
check this.
On the trunk the functions are inlined anyway, because we inline small
functions by default (and the functions are pure
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-15 15:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Winline
does not respect -fno-default-inline
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #32 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15
--- Comment #32 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 15:47
---
I am bit confused by logic of code here. Middle end now ingore DECL_INLINE
consistently, it is still arround since it affect some instantiation decisions
in C++ FE. Does fno-default-inline work? I think only way
--- Comment #34 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-01-15 15:59 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Winline does not respect
-fno-default-inline
> Yes, this is what I understand. I think we need a new flag specifying
> if in the source the 'inline' keyword was used and solely u
--- Comment #35 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 16:44 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Yes, this is what I understand. I think we need a new flag specifying
> if in the source the 'inline' keyword was used and solely use that for
> inline warning purposes. (That is, I would
10 matches
Mail list logo
