[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-25 02:24 --- Fixed by patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESO

[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-25 02:06 --- Subject: Bug 19330 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-25 02:05:43 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog expmed.c Log message:

[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-25 00:24 --- Patch here . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19330

[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-23 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 20:23 --- This regression was introduced by the following change: 2004-11-26 Richard Kenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * expmed.c (extract_bit_field): When extracting from non-integer mode, force a SUBREG

[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-23 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 19:48 --- The bad mem is generated by the call to extract_bit_field from this code in emit_group_load_1: (gdb) list 1678{ 1679 rtx mem; 1680 1681 gcc_assert (!bytepos

[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-

[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-15 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-01-15 16:34 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execu > --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15 > 12:39 --- > Why is this a middle-end bug? Is this not tar

[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-15 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15 12:39 --- Why is this a middle-end bug? Is this not target-specific? Anyone working on fixes? -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/19330] [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -O1

2005-01-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI, wrong-code Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg