--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28
01:22 ---
This is related to PR 17736 which is for empty global variables with empty
constructors.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28
01:45 ---
But it is still an enhancement because any missed optimization that does not
happen before is.
Also this is a middle-end bug since the middle-end and not the front-end figure
out that the function
is empt
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28
18:53 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I'll move this bug back to the C++ component.
Consider the following C++ code:
struct Foo { ~Foo() {} int i; };
struct A { Foo foo[2]; };
void foo () {
static A a;
}
We don'
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-01-28 19:11
---
Why do you think the front-end doesn't know that the destructor is empty?
It sees its definition, and it knows about potential destructors of
member objects and base classes, so it should have all the informat
