--
Bug 20225 depends on bug 20635, which changed state.
Bug 20635 Summary: [4.0 Regression] ICE in cgraph_mark_reachable_node
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20635
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-27
19:35 ---
This regression should be solved by the patch so I guess I will close it and
move on the new regression :(
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-25 11:05
---
This patch introduced a regression, see PR20635.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20225
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24
17:44 ---
Jan, you checked in a patch for this bug, but did not close it. Is there still
an sisue, or should this bug be marked fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20225
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18
14:57 ---
Subject: Bug 20225
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-18 14:57:15
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog cgraph.c varasm.c
Log
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18
18:15 ---
Subject: Bug 20225
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-18 18:15:09
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-13
05:20 ---
*** Bug 20449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10 13:37
---
The problem appears to be unrelated to the referenced patch.
Debugging shows that we have a node that has been removed from the cgraph_nodes
list. Because the node is not on the cgraph_nodes list, the
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10 15:15
---
Err, sorry, that how to reproduce snippet depended on some other changes
in my tree. You'll have to check
node-previous node-previous-next != node.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20225
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-03-03 12:56 ---
Also happens on i386.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-02-27 16:08 ---
I can reproduce it with a cross compiler from powerpc64-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20225
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-02-27 16:33 ---
Broken by this change:
2005-01-01 Richard Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c/19031
* c-decl.c (pop_file_scope): Call maybe_apply_pending_pragma_weaks.
* c-lang.c (finish_file): Don't
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Component|c++
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-26
23:55 ---
Hmm, the last time this happened, it was PR 17126.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20225
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-27
02:25 ---
Hmm, I cannot reproduce with a cross compiler from powerpc-darwin with today's
source. Either we
are missing compiling gcc or this could be related to one of my local patches
(which I really doubt it).
16 matches
Mail list logo
