[Bug middle-end/21032] GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations

2006-10-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 20:17 --- *** Bug 29538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/21032] GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations

2005-12-19 Thread bagnara at cs dot unipr dot it
--- Comment #7 from bagnara at cs dot unipr dot it 2005-12-20 07:49 --- I can confirm both problems (incorrect reordering and performance regression) are present in GCC version 4.0.2 and version 4.2.0 20051209 (experimental). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21032

[Bug middle-end/21032] GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations

2005-04-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-14 22:01 --- Note neg just flips a bit so it is correct anyways and there is no loss of precession. This also happens on ppc darwin, I don't know what to make of this. A C person has to comment to say something abou

[Bug middle-end/21032] GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations

2005-04-15 Thread bagnara at cs dot unipr dot it
--- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs dot unipr dot it 2005-04-15 07:01 --- Subject: Re: GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Note neg just flips a bit so it is correct anyways > and there is no loss of precession. Can you

[Bug middle-end/21032] GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations

2005-04-16 Thread bagnara at cs dot unipr dot it
--- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs dot unipr dot it 2005-04-16 12:27 --- I can add the following: 1) the bug was not present in GCC 3.3.3 and is present since version 3.4.0, so I think it qualifies as a regression; 2) the bug is also present in GCC 4.0.0 20050226 (prerelease),

[Bug middle-end/21032] GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations

2005-06-15 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
--- Additional Comments From vincent at vinc17 dot org 2005-06-15 16:49 --- I think that this is just bug 323 (which is a real bug, not invalid). Version 3.4 added other regressions related to this bug (e.g. when one has function calls), and this is not specific to the negate operation.

[Bug middle-end/21032] GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations

2005-06-15 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
--- Additional Comments From vincent at vinc17 dot org 2005-06-15 17:08 --- Oops, forget my comment. There is a bug, but 5.1.2.3#13 / 6.3.1.5#2 / 6.3.1.8#2 is not related to it if gcc does reduce the precision (due to the "volatile", that in fact prevents bug 323 from occurring here, rig

[Bug middle-end/21032] GCC 3.4.3 wrongly reorders floating-point operations

2005-06-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-15 17:26 --- This is unrelated to 323. The problem is that GCC does not implement a rounding modes correctly for C99 and therefor defines it as aways "normal" rounding mode and implements this transformation. --