--
Bug 21842 depends on bug 21843, which changed state.
Bug 21843 Summary: [4.1 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-2.c execution
fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21843
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-01 17:53
---
Fixed mainline 20050601.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21842
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-31
17:46 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] 23_containers/bitset/operations/2.cc
execution test fails
On Tue, 31 May 2005, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
> Ok, this is by itself absolutely useful, of course. Only, cat
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-31 17:14
---
> Testing manually it seems to fail with -O2 or -O but not -O0.
Ah, ah, the same happens for the other regression that you just filed, it
seems! Thanks.
> In general when reporting bugs shown up by my regression
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-31
17:05 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] 23_containers/bitset/operations/2.cc
execution test fails
On Tue, 31 May 2005, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
> Notice that *nothing* changed in the relevant libstdc++-v3 co
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-31 16:59
---
... well, at least both involve shifts ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21842
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-31
16:50 ---
I want to say the same patch which broke 920501-2.c also broke this.
--
What|Removed |Added
