[Bug middle-end/23488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] GCSE load PRE does not work with non sets (or missing load PRE with plain decls)

2007-11-05 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-05 22:29 --- Implementing this kind of load PRE for RTL again is more trouble than it is worth. It would require tracking of addresses in MEM rtx'en, hashing the MEM and the MEM address independently but solving the dataflow equa

[Bug middle-end/23488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] GCSE load PRE does not work with non sets (or missing load PRE with plain decls)

2007-09-08 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-08 19:37 --- Load PRE does still not optimize the test cases of comment #0 and comment #2. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/23488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] GCSE load PRE does not work with non sets (or missing load PRE with plain decls)

2007-07-07 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-07 22:23 --- Subject: Bug 23488 Author: dberlin Date: Sat Jul 7 22:23:26 2007 New Revision: 126449 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126449 Log: 2007-07-07 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rev

[Bug middle-end/23488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] GCSE load PRE does not work with non sets (or missing load PRE with plain decls)

2007-07-06 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-07 03:25 --- Subject: Bug 23488 Author: dberlin Date: Sat Jul 7 03:25:29 2007 New Revision: 126434 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126434 Log: 2007-07-06 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix

[Bug middle-end/23488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] GCSE load PRE does not work with non sets (or missing load PRE with plain decls)

2007-02-14 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23488