--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 19:58 ---
I've got a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unas
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 04:03 ---
Subject: Bug 23518
Author: kazu
Date: Thu Dec 22 04:03:32 2005
New Revision: 108940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108940
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/23518
* fold-const.c (mak
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 04:04 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milesto
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 04:06 ---
Oops, I forgot to change resolution to FIXED.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 16:28 ---
fold_range_test is wrong, around fold-const.c:4635
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23518
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
19:45 ---
Note signed overflow is undefined unless you use -fwrapv except that does not
fix this.
This is a bug in fold, most likely build_range_check.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
19:52 ---
Here is a java program (since -fwrapv is turned on by default for java
front-end unlike the C front-end
since it is undefined in C and defined in java):
class t
{
public static void main(String as[])
{
