[Bug middle-end/23848] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] stack deallocation can be more efficient

2007-11-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 19:03 --- Subject: Bug 23848 Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 15 19:02:54 2007 New Revision: 130206 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130206 Log: PR middle-end/23848 * tree-ssa-ccp.c (optimize_st

[Bug middle-end/23848] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] stack deallocation can be more efficient

2007-11-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-04 21:35 --- I'll be testing the following patch. It is quite simplistic, in that it will give up on bb boundaries, still it should IMHO trigger in quite a lot of cases. Each optimized out pair of __builtin_stack_save/__builtin_st

[Bug middle-end/23848] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] stack deallocation can be more efficient

2007-11-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-03 21:19 --- Will work on this. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|u

[Bug middle-end/23848] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] stack deallocation can be more efficient

2007-02-14 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23848

[Bug middle-end/23848] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] stack deallocation can be more efficient

2007-02-03 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23848

[Bug middle-end/23848] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] stack deallocation can be more efficient

2007-02-03 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 15:42 --- won't fix in GCC-4.0.4. Adjusting milestone. -- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---