--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 01:07 ---
Fixed then.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAIT
--- Comment #5 from jean-marc dot valin at usherbrooke dot ca 2005-11-02
00:57 ---
Tried it with gcc-4.1-20051029 and the problem's gone (well, this one at
least).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24601
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24601
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 00:52 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg01152.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24601
--- Comment #3 from jean-marc dot valin at usherbrooke dot ca 2005-11-01
00:20 ---
Can you send a link to a tarball of the compiler you want me to try?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24601
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 00:17 ---
Can you try a newer compiler as I cannot reproduce this with 20051026 ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24601
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
