[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-02-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 09:48 --- This patch introduces a regression FAIL: g++.dg/opt/complex5.C (test for excess errors) ICE on at least {i686,s390,s390x}-linux on gcc-4_1-branch in dom2 pass (with -O2). At copyrename2 the function is: double __compl

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-02-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 21:57 --- Fixed. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-02-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 21:57 --- Subject: Bug 25977 Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 3 21:57:08 2006 New Revision: 110565 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110565 Log: PR c++/25979 * gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_r

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-02-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 21:56 --- Subject: Bug 25977 Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 3 21:56:03 2006 New Revision: 110564 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110564 Log: PR c++/25979 * gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_r

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-01-31 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 03:01 --- Jason, do you have an ETA on a fix? -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-01-27 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-01-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 17:36 --- *** Bug 25979 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-01-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 15:54 --- Hmm: (void) ( = *(struct A &) (struct A *) &TARGET_EXPR , (struct A &) (struct A *) &r)>) >>> >>; Maybe it is not fully related to PR 19317 but a different issue really. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-01-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 15:50 --- Confirmed. Very much related to PR 19317 so CCing Jason. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/25977] [4.1/4.2 Regression] RSO vs NRV (twice)

2006-01-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |