--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 08:28 ---
Fixed in SVN.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGN
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 25989
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 26 08:20:57 2006
New Revision: 113268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113268
Log:
PR middle-end/25989
* tree-flow.h (struct omp_reg
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 23:12 ---
Ditto on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-04-20 03:04
---
Ditto on powerpc-linux, due to NULL for_stmt.
#0 extract_omp_for_data (for_stmt=0x0, fd=0xffa80d78)
at /src/gcc-current/gcc/omp-low.c:157
#1 0x10106a10 in expand_parallel_call (region=0x10792098, bb=0x40104
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
|
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 12:17
---
The testcase fails again (with a segfault):
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/pr25989.c (test for excess errors)
(from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-04/msg00920.html)
This is probably due to your fix from PR26823, Ja
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25989
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 21:44 ---
Fixed on the trunk.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 19:36 ---
Subject: Bug 25989
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 13 19:36:19 2006
New Revision: 112023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112023
Log:
PR middle-end/25989
* omp-low.c (expand_omp_for_g
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 12:50 ---
Confirmed, This is obvious invalid gimple:
D.1940 = __builtin_GOMP_loop_guided_next (&.istart0.2, &.iend0.3);
if (D.1940) goto ; else goto ;
:;
return;
:;
ii = (int) .istart0.2;
D.1938 = (int) .iend0.3;
11 matches
Mail list logo