--- Comment #23 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-02-04 17:52 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Fixed.
I can confirm this - with the exception of one case for which I filed a new
report: PR30700.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27657
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-04 15:29
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-04 15:28
---
Subject: Bug 27657
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Feb 4 15:27:53 2007
New Revision: 121576
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121576
Log:
2007-02-04 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #20 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-02-01 19:51
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > Any chance of a 4.2 backport ? Looks like varpool_node does not exist in 4.2
> > branch.
>
> I noticed this as well. It's easy enough to fix:
>
> 14:20
--- Comment #19 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-02-01 19:32 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Any chance of a 4.2 backport ? Looks like varpool_node does not exist in 4.2
> branch.
I noticed this as well. It's easy enough to fix:
14:20 < richi> tbm: sure s/varpool_/cgraph_varpool_/
Ric
--- Comment #18 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-02-01 19:25
---
Any chance of a 4.2 backport ? Looks like varpool_node does not exist in 4.2
branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27657
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 12:28
---
*** Bug 30651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 10:23
---
Fixed on the mainline.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-20 07:42
---
*** Bug 29417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 22:58 ---
I can confirm that the latest regression is from r112408.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27657
--- Comment #8 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 20:44 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=12037)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12037&action=view) [edit]
> patch
>
> It looks like we should bite the bullet and let cgraph code to ou
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 20:36 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The log message and the ChangeLog entry don't mention it, but this patch also
> modifies gcc/dwarf2out.c.
It was backed out right after the commit:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revi
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 19:43 ---
A regression hunt on powerpc-linux identified the following patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=112361
r112361 | geoffk | 2006-03-24 21:59:48 + (Fri, 24 Mar 2006)
The log message and the Chang
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-27 22:32 ---
Janis,
Can you do a regression hunt on this bug?
I almost think it was caused by revision 112408.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
14 matches
Mail list logo