[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-08-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #27 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 16:08 --- (In reply to comment #26) > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-pr27770.c (test for excess errors) Darwin support for section anchors is messed up and really I had wished Apple would have fixed the support for it bu

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-08-22 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #26 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-08-22 16:06 --- Should the testcase for this bug be marked as expected to fail on darwin since that platform has section-anchors disabled? I see... FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/section-anchors-pr27770.c (test for excess errors) bo

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-08-07 Thread dorit at il dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #25 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2006-08-07 07:09 --- (In reply to comment #24) > Fixed, a new different bug for the missed optimization should be opened. It's PR28628. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27770

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-08-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 17:03 --- Fixed, a new different bug for the missed optimization should be opened. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-08-04 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 16:48 --- The CPU2000 tests now pass, so as far as I'm concerned this is fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27770

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-08-03 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-08-04 06:04 --- fixed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27770

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-08-03 Thread dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 20:35 --- Subject: Bug 27770 Author: dorit Date: Thu Aug 3 20:35:05 2006 New Revision: 115910 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115910 Log: PR tree-optimization/27770 * tree-vectorizer.h (

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-07-29 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #20 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-07-29 20:30 --- Subject: Bug number PR27770 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg01215.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-07-23 Thread dorit at il dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #19 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2006-07-23 19:03 --- > The fix we've agreed is best in principle is to speculatively increase > the DECL_ALIGN of vectorisable variables before compiling functions. > Dorit says that there is a patch related to this on the autovect branch,

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-07-02 Thread richard at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #18 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-07-02 13:39 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec "hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Increasing alignment of static variable during tree optimizati

[Bug middle-end/27770] [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

2006-07-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-02 13:13 --- Increasing alignment of static variable during tree optimization should be as easy as increasing the DECL_ALIGN. All variables are output after all functions. Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi