--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-24 00:24
---
*** Bug 28358 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-02-03 09:47 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Fixed.
Richi, do you think you can check whether PR28358 is really a duplicate of this
bug (as Andrew thinks) and should be closed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28116
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 11:43
---
Mine. I'm testing the inliner fix.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 13:53
---
Subject: Bug 28116
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 5 13:53:45 2007
New Revision: 120480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120480
Log:
2007-01-05 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 13:57
---
Subject: Bug 28116
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 5 13:56:54 2007
New Revision: 120481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120481
Log:
2007-01-05 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 14:00
---
Subject: Bug 28116
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 5 14:00:46 2007
New Revision: 120482
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120482
Log:
2007-01-05 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 14:02
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from chris_clayton at f1internet dot com 2006-11-26 12:54
---
I'm the reporter of 29809, which is a duplicate of this bug. I'm not familiar
with the workflow here, so do I simply wait for 4.1.2 or is there likely to be
patch to test before 4.1.2 is released? Is the
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 13:09
---
Usually you wait until a patch is available or 4.1.2 is released (supposed the
problem is fixed there). You can try testing the ad-hoc fix in PR29809 comment
#4.
--
--- Comment #13 from chris_clayton at f1internet dot com 2006-11-26 21:22
---
(In reply to comment #12)
Usually you wait until a patch is available or 4.1.2 is released (supposed the
problem is fixed there). You can try testing the ad-hoc fix in PR29809
comment
#4.
OK, I've
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 17:07
---
*** Bug 29809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28116
--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 16:35 ---
I wasn't able to do a regression hunt for the fix on the mainline because I
didn't find any revision for which the test failed on the mainline.
A regression hunt on the 4.1 branch using the testcase from comment #7
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 09:46 ---
Janis, can you check what fixed this on the mainline? Thanks!
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 06:05 ---
*** Bug 28840 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-08-25 06:33 ---
reduced testcase from pr28840
struct QDateTime
{
QDateTime addSecs( int secs ) const;
int t;
};
QDateTime gridToDate(long x)
{
QDateTime date;
date = date.addSecs(1);
return date;
}
void whatsOnAt(long x,
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-22 16:58 ---
In GCC trunk bootstrap + regression testing the tree-nrv optimization hits 584
types, out of this 38 cases have TREE_ADDRESSABLE set on the RESULT_DECL
(because C++ FE already NRV optimized it, address of retval was
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 12:20 ---
This sounds like a tree-nrv bug to me.
We have at *.optimized:
QTime QTime::msToTime() (this)
{
struct QTimeD.1732 D.1772;
struct QTimeD.1732 tD.1765;
(voidD.34) 0;
D.1772 = addMSecs (retval);
retval =
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
Summary|[4.1 Regression] ICE when |[4.1
19 matches
Mail list logo
