--- Comment #11 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-09-04 12:18 ---
The patch was committed to r128075.
Revital
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28684
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-31 20:55
---
*** Bug 32172 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 15:25 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I would also like to be assigned to this bug.
Thanks,
Revital
Done.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 15:27 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Subject: Bug number PR 28684
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00110.html
I
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-03 12:11 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 28684
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00110.html
--
--- Comment #4 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2006-09-11 10:57 ---
You could help by looking at the source code (there are only a few dozens
places mentioning flag_unsafe_math_optimizations) and auditing which places
would be more suited to a new flag_reassociate_fp variable.
we'd
--- Comment #5 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2006-09-11 11:21 ---
Hi,
Following Dorit's comment; We thought of starting this journey with a patch
that include the cases in the vectorizer and loop-unroll and gradually add the
rest of the cases that can go under flag_reassociate_fp.
--- Comment #6 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2006-09-11 11:49 ---
I would also like to be assigned to this bug.
Thanks,
Revital
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28684
--- Comment #2 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-08-17 14:17 ---
Richard,
Thanks for confirmation. There's no chance of this happening soon, I guess?
I'm working on a release of ATLAS (fast linear algebra), and I can't enable gcc
vectorization until its necessary flags are
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-08-17 14:28 ---
It probably will not happen before 4.3 and, even if it happened for 4.2, it
will never be backported to 4.1 since this one is in regression fixes-only
mode.
You could help by looking at the source code (there are only a
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-11 15:39 ---
Confirmed. I think we should split at least the reassociation and reciprocals
from -funsafe-math-optimizations, as for example on x86 we create fsin/fsincos
and friends which are of lower precision than required.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|c
12 matches
Mail list logo
