[Bug middle-end/29726] [4.2/4.3 regression] invalid folding of ((X >> C1) & C2) != 0 or "M-x is undefined" in emacs

2006-11-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug middle-end/29726] [4.2/4.3 regression] invalid folding of ((X >> C1) & C2) != 0 or "M-x is undefined" in emacs

2006-11-07 Thread christophe at saout dot de
--- Comment #1 from christophe at saout dot de 2006-11-07 11:23 --- The function "test" (even compiled with -O0, on i386 BTW) assumes that the condition can never occur, as the complete if condition is completely optimized away and the function always returns "1". #include int test(in

[Bug middle-end/29726] [4.2/4.3 regression] invalid folding of ((X >> C1) & C2) != 0 or "M-x is undefined" in emacs

2006-11-07 Thread belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
--- Comment #2 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2006-11-07 13:00 --- testing a patch. -- belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/29726] [4.2/4.3 regression] invalid folding of ((X >> C1) & C2) != 0 or "M-x is undefined" in emacs

2006-11-07 Thread belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
--- Comment #3 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2006-11-07 18:26 --- Patch posted. -- belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/29726] [4.2/4.3 regression] invalid folding of ((X >> C1) & C2) != 0 or "M-x is undefined" in emacs

2006-11-09 Thread sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 19:24 --- Subject: Bug 29726 Author: sayle Date: Thu Nov 9 19:24:32 2006 New Revision: 118625 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118625 Log: 2006-11-09 Serge Belyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR middl