http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32074
--- Comment #8 from Siarhei Siamashka
2012-03-29 10:11:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > We have __builtin_unreachable() now which should allow for this
> > optimization.
>
> I've been using __builtin_unreachabl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32074
--- Comment #7 from Siarhei Siamashka
2012-03-29 09:31:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Fixed by means of __builtin_unreachable ().
But __builtin_unreachable() is not a part of C standard yet? Is there no way to
extract some useful informat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32074
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32074
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Johnson 2012-03-29 02:46:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> We have __builtin_unreachable() now which should allow for this optimization.
I've been using __builtin_unreachable() for some time now, and it's very nice
f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32074
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-18
23:00:28 UTC ---
We have __builtin_unreachable() now which should allow for this optimization.
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-05-24 22:57
---
Subject: Re: Optimizer does not exploit assertions
> --- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-24 22:54
> ---
> __builtin_expect should not be overloaded, but
> __builtin_assert/assum
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-24 22:54 ---
__builtin_expect should not be overloaded, but __builtin_assert/assume/whatever
could be invented for this.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
