--- Comment #10 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-06 14:27
---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg00341.html
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-06 18:28
---
Bootstrap succeeded on both, ppc darwin and i686 darwin. disable-checking!
Thank you!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32209
--- Comment #8 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-05 10:46
---
This is the commit causing this failure:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-06/msg00052.html
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-06-05 13:44 ---
Mr. Tobler
Thanks for pursuing this. For me. as a user, it is solved. My analysis, as an
outsider, points to the corruption, inadvertent chang, update malfunction of an
include file shared by the *.c files leading
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-04 20:09
---
can you post the config flags? Did you may use --disable-checking ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32209
--- Comment #2 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-06-04 20:42 ---
Confirmation on different architecture (powerpc-linux-gnu G4) doing an *.nm
comparison as follows: on c-common.o
16c16
00017d5c t add_tlist
---
00017d60 t add_tlist
60c60
00018ca0 T c_add_case_label
---
00018ca4
--- Comment #3 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-06-04 20:56 ---
Took the liberty of adding Prof Sikora and the release manager, Could not add
MR
Zedenek Dvorak (refusla by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This seems to be a case Maintainers no doing the required bootstraps. I am
amazed that
--- Comment #4 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-06-04 21:56 ---
Here is the build machinery used on the powerpc: There were two changes made to
prior runs that caused no boot failures:
BUILD was incresed from 11 to 12
form enable-languages c++, fortran were removed as being
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-04 22:01 ---
So you found a bug that was only exposed with --disable-checking which
usually means two thing, a gcc_assert really has side effects or something is
being micompiled now. Also by the way since the trunk works
--- Comment #6 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-06-05 01:29 ---
Fantastic; My stupidity in copying the disable-checking from one of the dozen
top distributors (which make experimental gcc-4.x.y available, patched them
with gcc-3.x.y stuff and referred users to contact gcc
--- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-05 04:48
---
still broken for disable-checking
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
13 matches
Mail list logo
