https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32503
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Confirmed. I had done tree-level expansion of powi into add/mul sequences at
> one time. But this had been rejected for some reason I cannot remember
> right n
--- Comment #3 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 19:00 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Confirmed. I had done tree-level expansion of powi into add/mul sequences at
> one time. But this had been rejected for some reason I cannot remember right
> now.
The middle-end is able to ex
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 10:47 ---
Confirmed. I had done tree-level expansion of powi into add/mul sequences at
one time. But this had been rejected for some reason I cannot remember right
now.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 19:56 ---
> Additionally: It would be great if there would be a variant for long integers
> (8 byte integers) and long long (16 byte integers) as PR32239 could only use
> __builtin_powi for int4 and not for int8 or int16.
Actu
