[Bug middle-end/33273] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/1.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-09-07 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-07 14:57 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00084.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33273

[Bug middle-end/33273] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/1.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-09-07 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-07 14:55 --- *** Bug 2 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/33273] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/1.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-09-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-01 15:25 --- Sorry Sandra, I see looking at the backtrace in more detail that the ICE arises from the new code added here: 2007-08-24 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * expr.c (store_expr): Optimize initialization of

[Bug middle-end/33273] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/1.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-08-31 Thread sandra at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #2 from sandra at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-01 01:50 --- Unfortunately I have no pa machine here for testing this myself. Off the top of my head, I would suggest looking at the part of the patch discussed here, which was the only part that I thought would change behavior

[Bug middle-end/33273] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/ignore/char/1.cc (test for excess errors)

2007-08-31 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-01 01:12 --- Breakpoint 1, gen_setmemsi (operand0=0x402a02a0, operand1=0x60175290, operand2=0x601751d0, operand3=0x601751e0) at ../../gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa.md:3744 3744 (gdb) p debug_rtx (operand0) (mem/s/c:QI (plus:SI (re