http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308
Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-23 05:27 ---
Sometimes doing the strength reduction actually increases the code size. Think
on targets which have auto increments.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22586 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from xinliangli at gmail dot com 2008-02-23 06:55 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Sometimes doing the strength reduction actually increases the code size.
Think
on targets which have auto increments.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22586 ***
Itanium
