http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7
--- Comment #30 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #29 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-11-06 16:25:00
UTC ---
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602099#20
in case someone’s interested…
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #28 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-11-03 21:41:38
UTC ---
OK, added.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #27 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-01 16:58:20
UTC ---
Better: not for this testcase. We found it on CRIS, but the bug could really
happen on any target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #26 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-11-01 16:53:18
UTC ---
Probably, but not on m68k ;-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nospamname at web dot de
--- Comment #25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #24 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-01 16:38:53
UTC ---
You'd need also the patch for bug 41064.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
Thorsten Glaser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot org
--- Comment #23 fr
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:12
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #21 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-12-29 19:30 ---
Reopening since it is still broken on the other open branches.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-20 14:29 ---
m68k-linux-gnu is neither primary nor secondary target.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-16 21:02 ---
But that was the meat of fixing PR28690. :-(
The insn should satisfy the constraints of alternative 4.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #5 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-09-16 21:00 ---
Reverting this change in commutative_operand_precedence fixes the testcase:
case RTX_OBJ:
/* Complex expressions should be the first, so decrease priority
- of objects. */
- return -1;
+ of
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-09-11 15:29 ---
I think there is a missing constrain_operands somewhere, because in
(define_insn "*addsi3_internal"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=m,?a,?a,d,a")
(plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" "
--- Comment #3 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-09-11 15:19 ---
Caused by:
2007-07-23 Peter Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR middle-end/PR28690
Can be reproduced with gcc.c-torture/execute/20060420-1.c when compiled with
-O2.
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
