[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-28 14:19 --- Subject: Bug 37125 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 28 14:18:23 2008 New Revision: 139709 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139709 Log: 2008-08-28 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 12:45 --- Subject: Bug 37125 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 22 12:43:49 2008 New Revision: 139450 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139450 Log: 2008-08-22 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 10:34 --- Same issue as PR36548. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36548 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-22 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-22 09:28 --- sorry, I use 64bit linux for testing. I tested again. works well on all 64bit 4.2.4, 4.3.0, 4.3.2-RC1. works well on 4.2.4 32bit. works failed on gcc 4.3.0 32bit. wokrs failed on gcc 4.3.2 RC1 32bit. -- http://gcc

[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 09:01 --- It only fails for 32bit targets. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37125

[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-21 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-22 00:31 --- works well on 4.2.4, 4.3.0, 4.3.2-RC1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37125

[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-18 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37125

[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-15 Thread regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
--- Comment #3 from regehr at cs dot utah dot edu 2008-08-15 17:20 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Probably a dup of PR36548. > But PR36548 seemed to be about overflow whereas this one doesn't appear to have any overflows. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37125

[Bug middle-end/37125] [4.3/4.4 Regression] possible integer codegen bug

2008-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-15 14:37 --- Probably a dup of PR36548. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added