[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-10-29 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-10-29 19:43 --- Deleted test as it is no longer valid since we don't support non-unit-at-a-time. -- sje at cup dot hp dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-10-29 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-29 19:41 --- Subject: Bug 37339 Author: sje Date: Wed Oct 29 19:41:26 2008 New Revision: 141440 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141440 Log: PR middle-end/37339 * gcc.dg/pr33545-3.c: Remove. Re

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-10-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-29 15:31 --- The problem is that -fno-toplevel-reorder is often more restrictive than -fno-unit-at-a-time used to be. I guess instead of removing the testcase we should just remove -fno-unit-at-a-time, or add -ftoplevel-reorder.

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-10-28 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #4 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-10-28 21:51 --- I have posted a patch in which I propose removing this test. It has not gotten any feedback yet. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00826.html -- sje at cup dot hp dot com changed: What|Rem

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-10-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-28 21:37 --- *** Bug 37944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-10-21 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37339

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-10-16 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-10-16 23:17 --- This test uses -fno-unit-at-a-time which basically no longer exists. I believe it is currently accepted as an alias for -fno-toplevel-reorder. Does it make sense to just remove this test? -- sje at cup dot hp dot co

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-09-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 02:20 --- Seen also on cris-elf at 139894 and later, passed at 139890. See also . -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

2008-09-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4 Regression]|[4.4 Regression] |gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-|gcc.