[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 22:53 --- Revision 139827 is bad. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37378

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 21:43 --- Revision 139832 is bad. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37378

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 19:44 --- his regression was introduced between revisions 139822 and 139853. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37378

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 13:51 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Divide_X > > > All failures have > > > > -2147483648 > > -2147483648 > > 0 > > 0 > > 0 > > java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero > > java.lang.Arithmetic

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-05 Thread jh at suse dot cz
--- Comment #6 from jh at suse dot cz 2008-09-05 12:39 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Divide_X > All failures have > > -2147483648 > -2147483648 > 0 > 0 > 0 > java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero > java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero I've caused bug in expand_divmod that

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-04 21:13 --- All failures have -2147483648 -2147483648 0 0 0 java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero -9223372036854775808 0 java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero java.lang.ArithmeticE

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 21:09 --- >From the revisions it certainly wasn't me. But all the selective scheduler is in. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 21:07 --- Your latest testresults don't include the Divide_2 failure anymore. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37378

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 21:05 --- Architecture? I don't see these. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37378] [4.4 Regression] Divide_X

2008-09-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-04 21:02 --- Unfortunately, trunk was broken from revision 139821 to 139861 on ia64. This regression may be caused by patches from Richard or Honza. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed