--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 21:45 ---
Subject: Bug 37447
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Oct 12 21:44:33 2008
New Revision: 141079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141079
Log:
2008-10-12 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport from main
--- Comment #9 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 20:27 ---
Subject: Bug 37447
Author: rth
Date: Sun Oct 12 20:26:24 2008
New Revision: 141077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141077
Log:
PR middle-end/37447
* Makefile.in (reload1.o): Depend
--- Comment #8 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 20:27 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 16:22 ---
The patch from comment #3 passes bootstrap and regtests on powerpc64-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37447
--- Comment #6 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 11:27
---
This patch also fixes miscompilation of vla1.f90 test on ia64 on sel-sched
branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37447
--- Comment #5 from luisgpm at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2008-10-02
01:43 ---
This problem also showed up as a CPU2000 regression in the Sixtrack benchmark
for PPC64, causing problems in the ondering of ld/st instructions.
A GCC patched with Richard's fix produced the right code a
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 00:21 ---
The test passes with a simple build of gcc with the patch from comment#3. I
fired off a bootstrap and testsuite run.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37447
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-01 23:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=16446)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16446&action=view)
proposed patch
Please try this and see if it works. I believe it does, since I see
- stw 21,16(9)
- a
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 15:14 ---
With a mainline from today, it fails for me at -O2. Looking into it, it's
foo() that is miscompiled (I broke the 3 functions into their own files and
recompiled them), It's also the last element of results (ie, res
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37447
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 18:23 ---
Confirmed, I see it too. I configure GCC with --with-tune=cell.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |blocker
Component|target |middle-end
13 matches
Mail list logo
