[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

2009-05-11 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 16:49 --- Subject: Bug 40080 Author: hjl Date: Mon May 11 16:49:17 2009 New Revision: 147390 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147390 Log: 2009-05-11 H.J. Lu Backport from mainline: 2009-0

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

2009-05-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-11 16:40 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

2009-05-11 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 16:37 --- Subject: Bug 40080 Author: hjl Date: Mon May 11 16:37:07 2009 New Revision: 147389 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147389 Log: 2009-05-11 H.J. Lu PR middle-end/40080 * gcc.c-to

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

2009-05-09 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-09 20:10 --- Subject: Bug 40080 Author: hubicka Date: Sat May 9 20:10:37 2009 New Revision: 147320 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147320 Log: PR middle-end/40080 * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_m

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

2009-05-09 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #3 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-05-09 18:52 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt Hi, I am testing the following: Index: cgraphunit.c === --- cgraphunit.c(rev

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

2009-05-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-09 09:21 --- Honza, this is caused by your cgraph changes. Likely an easier to reproduced case than PR40079. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added