--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 14:09 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 14:07 ---
Subject: Bug 40669
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 7 14:07:19 2009
New Revision: 149329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149329
Log:
PR middle-end/40669
* tree-tailcall.c (adjust_ret
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.3.3 4.4.0
Known to work||4.3.4 4.5
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 12:44 ---
Subject: Bug 40669
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 7 12:44:32 2009
New Revision: 149321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149321
Log:
2009-07-07 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/40328
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 12:18 ---
Subject: Bug 40669
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 7 12:18:38 2009
New Revision: 149319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149319
Log:
PR middle-end/40669
* tree-tailcall.c (adjust_ret
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 10:01 ---
4.4 will need a backport of PR40328 as well. Your attached patch is ok.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 09:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=18150)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18150&action=view)
gcc45-pr40669.patch
Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=406
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 09:23 ---
Yeah, PR40328. Then we are left with
t.i: In function test:
t.i:22: error: invalid operand to binary operator
add_acc.0_64
t.i:22: error: invalid operand to binary operator
add_acc.0_64
t.i:22: internal compile
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 09:15 ---
With my local 4.3 copy it prints
t.i: In function test:
t.i:22: error: PHI def is not a GIMPLE value
add_acc.0_64 = PHI (0), add_acc.0_60(7),
add_acc.0_64(6), add_acc.0_64(4)>
COMPLEX_EXPR <0.0, 0.0>;
t.i:22: er
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40669
11 matches
Mail list logo