--- Comment #7 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-07-12 15:06 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Both.
This seems to fix the issue, indeed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40726
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-12 14:58 ---
Both.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40726
--- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-07-12 14:35 ---
> In which case you should
> > try removing DECL_IS_MALLOC (fndecl) = 1 in trans-decl.c.
this matches twice (line 1565 and line 1429). Which one should be removed ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-12 14:30 ---
Instead, if the Fortran return type does not have POINTER, TARGET or
ALLOCATABLE
attributes the middle-end type for the result-decl should have TYPE_RESTRICT
set if it is a pointer.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-07-12 14:30 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Do you by chance return pointers in any function? In which case you should
> try removing DECL_IS_MALLOC (fndecl) = 1 in trans-decl.c. I pointed this out
> to Paul already, but appearantly it
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40726
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-12 14:24 ---
Do you by chance return pointers in any function? In which case you should
try removing DECL_IS_MALLOC (fndecl) = 1 in trans-decl.c. I pointed this out
to Paul already, but appearantly it is still stuck in his whol
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40726
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-07-12 14:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=18180)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18180&action=view)
testcase
correct results with
gfortran -c -O0 PR40726.f90
wrong code with
gfortran -c -O1 PR40726.f90
--
http
