--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 01:16 ---
Subject: Bug 42837
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 19 01:16:28 2010
New Revision: 156885
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156885
Log:
PR c++/42837
* class.c (create_vtable_ptr): Set
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:27
---
Do we have any evidence that this is actually a regression? If this test has
never worked on IA64/HPPA, then this is not a regression. It should then be
XFAIL'd on those platforms, with this PR left open.
--
--- Comment #6 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-02-17 18:03 ---
I tried the test with GCC 4.4.0 and 4.3.3 on IA64, in those cases the test
failed because we didn't actually pack anything and then the if test failed and
we called abort.
$ /opt/hp-gcc-4.3.3/bin/g++ -Wpacked packed1.C
--- Comment #3 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-02-16 18:48 ---
I would guess this failure started with r156088 when the test was added. I
think the test is OK but that ia64 can't handle packing OUTER when one of the
fields in OUTER is a struct with a virtual function.
--
sje at
--- Comment #4 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-02-16 18:50 ---
Forgot to mention that the test was added along with a fix for PR c++/41788.
I don't think the fix or the test are bad though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42837
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-24 14:59 ---
The failure also occurs on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42837
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 11:20 ---
*** Bug 42838 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42837
