http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19
09:28:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
By the way I think we could get cases where the user wrote volatile in one
case
and non-volatile in another so fixing up the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-09-01 03:03:31 |2011-12-09
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.5.4
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08
06:42:22 UTC ---
Just to remind the middle-end folks that stage 1 is a fine time for deciding on
middle-end volatile semantics, before we forget about this for another 6