http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-28
17:05:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 28 17:05:07 2011
New Revision: 170568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170568
Log:
PR middle-end/47893
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25
12:48:38 UTC ---
Seems to be caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159480
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25
16:06:14 UTC ---
I guess not including the space added in add_frame_space by the
assign_stack_local_1 call in temp_slot's size/full_size, while it would be easy
to do (just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25
16:10:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Similarly not queuing anything into frame_space lists
when assign_stack_local is called from within assign_stack_temp_for_type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25
17:24:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
My temptation would be to revert until someone can get in there and design
things so that we either have a single list or there's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25
17:25:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 23468
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23468
Test patch
Does this fix it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25
17:39:36 UTC ---
I guess that would break pa, because then
else if (!STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED)
{
...
}
will be executed whenever record_alignment_slots is false,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25
18:43:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 23469
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23469
statistics gathering patch
With this patch I got fncnt array summaries from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25
19:09:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 23471
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23471
gcc46-pr47893.patch
Updated patch, so far just lightly tested that it fixes
15 matches
Mail list logo
